36C3 - A systematic evaluation of OpenBSD's mitigations
推荐理由
the presenter explicitly calls out OpenBSD's tendency to present mitigations without specific examples of CVEs it defeats
说明
这是2019年由media.ccc.de发布的一部演讲,主题归在Security & hacking。它讲的是operating system security这一支里的具体问题,而不是把整个领域扫一遍。适合想看推导、证明或实现细节的人。内容上可以概括成:A 36C3 talk that systematically evaluates OpenBSD's exploit mitigations, asking how effective they really are and what they cost in performance, complexity and inspectability. It challenges the project's security marketing.这些读者给出的理由,核心是:Cited in OpenBSD threads as a skeptical, evidence-based counterpoint to claims about its security, though some dispute its objectivity.它贴着当时的技术,看的时候要记得那是那个年份的判断。从2020年到2024年,有1位不同的读者在1个不同月份把它推荐出来,其中明确叫别人去看的有0次。适合一次性看完。讲者把一个判断讲透,演示是在给这个判断配例子。如果已经会了基本定义,就把注意力放在它怎么把operating system security变成能跟着复述的例子。
视频信息
- 频道
- media.ccc.de
- 时长
- 53 分 2 秒
- 发布年份
- 2019
同主题更多
- Behind the Scenes of iOS Security
- Why Electronic Voting Is Still A Bad Idea
- USENIX Security '18-Q: Why Do Keynote Speakers Keep Suggesting That Improving Security Is Possible?
- Defcon 18 Changing threats to privacy Moxie Marlinspike Part
- 28c3: The Science of Insecurity
- DEF CON 25 - John Sotos - Genetic Diseases to Guide Digital Hacks of the Human Genome