Why our generals were more successful in World War II than in Korea, Vietnam or Iraq/Afghanistan
推荐理由
Possibly the best analysis of this I have yet seen is the video
强烈推荐m0llusk · 原文
说明
这是2011年由UC Berkeley Events发布的一部课堂讲座,主题归在Military history & warfare。它讲的是military leadership accountability这一支里的具体问题,而不是把整个领域扫一遍。适合按兴趣直接看、不打算先补课的人。内容上可以概括成:Thomas Ricks's Nimitz Memorial Lecture at UC Berkeley asks why US generals did better in World War II than in Korea, Vietnam or Iraq and Afghanistan. A central point is the WWII practice of quickly reassigning or relieving underperforming generals.这些读者给出的理由,核心是:Used in hiring and management debates as an analysis of fast evaluation, quick dismissal without stigma, and the cost of keeping underperformers.讲法不绑某一条新闻,过几年仍然可以当材料看。从2018年到2024年,有3位不同的读者在3个不同月份把它推荐出来,其中明确叫别人去看的有1次。节奏接近上课,可以暂停做笔记。它假设你愿意跟着一条推导走完。如果已经会了基本定义,就把注意力放在它怎么把military leadership accountability变成能跟着复述的例子。
视频信息
- 频道
- UC Berkeley Events
- 时长
- 58 分 49 秒
- 发布年份
- 2011
同主题更多
- Mechanical Computer (All Parts) - Basic Mechanisms In Fire Control Computers
- U.S. NAVY BASIC MECHANISMS OF FIRE CONTROL COMPUTERS MECHANICAL COMPUTER INSTRUCTIONAL FILM 27794
- The Secret War
- This Is What Winning Looks Like (Full Length)
- Tiedustelueverstin arvio Venäjästä | 3.12.2018
- Secret History of Silicon Valley