PickVidsWhat Happened When This City Banned Housing Investors
推荐理由
Rotterdam did just this, and the effect was that the price to purchase a house did not measurably decrease, and that rents rose.
说明
这是2023年由Oh The Urbanity!发布的一部讲解，主题归在Transit, cities & urban planning。它讲的是housing investor bans这一支里的具体问题，而不是把整个领域扫一遍。适合按兴趣直接看、不打算先补课的人。内容上可以概括成：Oh The Urbanity! tests the theory that banning housing investors would fix affordability, using Rotterdam's ban as a case study. The video finds mixed results.这些读者给出的理由，核心是：Cited as a real-world experiment showing that banning investors did not lower purchase prices and may have raised rents.它贴着当时的技术，看的时候要记得那是那个年份的判断。从2023年到2024年，有0位不同的读者在0个不同月份把它推荐出来，其中明确叫别人去看的有0次。适合用一集把一个概念补上的人。抓住它用的那个图像或类比，比背公式重要。如果已经会了基本定义，就把注意力放在它怎么把housing investor bans变成能跟着复述的例子。
视频信息
- 频道
- Oh The Urbanity!
- 时长
- 9 分 16 秒
- 发布年份
- 2023
同主题更多
- How Self-Driving Cars will Destroy Cities (and what to do about it)
- Stroads are Ugly, Expensive, and Dangerous (and they're everywhere) [ST05]
- Why This Channel Exists (and why I hate Houston)
- Why American Cities Are Broke - The Growth Ponzi Scheme [ST03]
- The Wrong Way to Set Speed Limits [ST06]
- Cities Aren't Loud: Cars Are Loud