The LED Traffic Light and the Danger of "But Sometimes!"
推荐理由
I love Technology Connections' take on this line of argument [0]
强烈推荐lolinder · 原文
说明
这是2018年由Technology Connections发布的一部讲解,主题归在Transit, cities & urban planning。它讲的是led traffic lights and technology criticism这一支里的具体问题,而不是把整个领域扫一遍。适合按兴趣直接看、不打算先补课的人。内容上可以概括成:Technology Connections explains how LED traffic lights, which do not melt snow, drew complaints and were blamed for accidents. He uses it to illustrate the 'but sometimes' fallacy against new technology.这些读者给出的理由,核心是:Cited constantly as the name and example of the 'but sometimes' argument, where edge cases are used to resist better technology such as EVs and solar.讲法不绑某一条新闻,过几年仍然可以当材料看。从2019年到2024年,有7位不同的读者在6个不同月份把它推荐出来,其中明确叫别人去看的有3次。适合用一集把一个概念补上的人。抓住它用的那个图像或类比,比背公式重要。如果已经会了基本定义,就把注意力放在它怎么把led traffic lights and technology criticism变成能跟着复述的例子。
视频信息
- 频道
- Technology Connections
- 时长
- 18 分 31 秒
- 发布年份
- 2018
同主题更多
- How Self-Driving Cars will Destroy Cities (and what to do about it)
- Stroads are Ugly, Expensive, and Dangerous (and they're everywhere) [ST05]
- Why This Channel Exists (and why I hate Houston)
- Why American Cities Are Broke - The Growth Ponzi Scheme [ST03]
- The Wrong Way to Set Speed Limits [ST06]
- Cities Aren't Loud: Cars Are Loud