PickVidsBusiness Parks Suck (but they don't have to)
推荐理由
makes a similar case for generic concrete business parks in the USA and Canada compared to one in the Netherlands.
说明
这是2022年由Not Just Bikes发布的一部讲解，主题归在Transit, cities & urban planning。它讲的是urban planning这一支里的具体问题，而不是把整个领域扫一遍。适合按兴趣直接看、不打算先补课的人。内容上可以概括成：Not Just Bikes contrasts typical car-dependent North American business parks with one near the airport in the Netherlands that works for driving, cycling and transit. It looks at how the design makes commuting easier.这些读者给出的理由，核心是：HN cites it as an example of a business park that is drivable yet bike and transit friendly, in urbanism and transport threads.讲法不绑某一条新闻，过几年仍然可以当材料看。从2022年到2025年，有2位不同的读者在2个不同月份把它推荐出来，其中明确叫别人去看的有0次。适合用一集把一个概念补上的人。抓住它用的那个图像或类比，比背公式重要。如果已经会了基本定义，就把注意力放在它怎么把urban planning变成能跟着复述的例子。
视频信息
- 频道
- Not Just Bikes
- 时长
- 15 分 43 秒
- 发布年份
- 2022
同主题更多
- How Self-Driving Cars will Destroy Cities (and what to do about it)
- Stroads are Ugly, Expensive, and Dangerous (and they're everywhere) [ST05]
- Why This Channel Exists (and why I hate Houston)
- Why American Cities Are Broke - The Growth Ponzi Scheme [ST03]
- The Wrong Way to Set Speed Limits [ST06]
- Cities Aren't Loud: Cars Are Loud