PickVidsMunk Debate on Artificial Intelligence | Bengio & Tegmark vs. Mitchell & LeCun
推荐理由
Tis a good one
说明
这是2023年由Policy-Relevant Science & Technology发布的一部演讲，主题归在AI safety, AGI & impact。它讲的是ai existential risk这一支里的具体问题，而不是把整个领域扫一遍。适合按兴趣直接看、不打算先补课的人。内容上可以概括成：A Munk Debate on the proposition that AI research and development poses an existential threat. Yoshua Bengio and Max Tegmark argue for it, and Melanie Mitchell and Yann LeCun argue against.这些读者给出的理由，核心是：HN commenters recommend it as a good debate with leading figures on both sides of the AI existential risk question.它贴着当时的技术，看的时候要记得那是那个年份的判断。从2023年到2023年，有2位不同的读者在2个不同月份把它推荐出来，其中明确叫别人去看的有0次。适合一次性看完。讲者把一个判断讲透，演示是在给这个判断配例子。如果已经会了基本定义，就把注意力放在它怎么把ai existential risk变成能跟着复述的例子。
视频信息
- 频道
- Policy-Relevant Science & Technology
- 时长
- 1 小时 47 分
- 发布年份
- 2023
同主题更多
- What Happened to Horses Is Happening to Us
- Why Would AI Want to do Bad Things? Instrumental Convergence
- Veritasium: What Everyone Gets Wrong About AI and Learning – Derek Muller Explains
- Intelligence and Stupidity: The Orthogonality Thesis
- We're building a dystopia just to make people click on ads | Zeynep Tufekci
- Intro to AI Safety, Remastered