Do these scatter plots reveal fraudulent vote-switching in Michigan?
推荐理由
here's a video that debunks many of his claims
说明
这是2020年由Stand-up Maths发布的一部讲解,主题归在Data science & statistics。它讲的是election fraud statistics这一支里的具体问题,而不是把整个领域扫一遍。适合按兴趣直接看、不打算先补课的人。内容上可以概括成:Matt Parker of Stand-up Maths examines scatter plots that were claimed to show fraudulent vote-switching in Michigan's 2020 election. He recreates the analysis and shows that the pattern arises from comparing percentages across different bases, not from fraud.这些读者给出的理由,核心是:HN commenters cite it as a clear debunking of election-fraud statistics and as a warning against comparing percentages without context.它贴着当时的技术,看的时候要记得那是那个年份的判断。从2020年到2021年,有4位不同的读者在2个不同月份把它推荐出来,其中明确叫别人去看的有0次。适合用一集把一个概念补上的人。抓住它用的那个图像或类比,比背公式重要。如果已经会了基本定义,就把注意力放在它怎么把election fraud statistics变成能跟着复述的例子。
视频信息
- 频道
- Stand-up Maths
- 时长
- 18 分 16 秒
- 发布年份
- 2020
同主题更多
- A Better Default Colormap for Matplotlib | SciPy 2015 | Nathaniel Smith and Stéfan van der Walt
- DON'T PANIC — Hans Rosling showing the facts about population
- Is Most Published Research Wrong?
- How not to be ignorant about the world | Hans and Ola Rosling
- I don't like notebooks.- Joel Grus (Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence)
- VisiData Lightning Demo at PyCascades 2018