Why was Biden's win calculated to be ONE IN A QUADRILLION?
推荐理由
has analyzed some of the numerical allegations of fraud
说明
这是2020年由Stand-up Maths发布的一部讲解,主题归在Data science & statistics。它讲的是election statistics debunking这一支里的具体问题,而不是把整个领域扫一遍。适合按兴趣直接看、不打算先补课的人。内容上可以概括成:Matt Parker of Stand-up Maths examines the Texas Supreme Court filing claiming Biden's 2020 win had a one-in-a-quadrillion chance. He walks through why the statistical argument is flawed.这些读者给出的理由,核心是:Cited as a mathematician's debunking of numerical claims of 2020 election fraud.它更像一份当时的现场记录,适合了解那个节点的争论。从2020年到2024年,有1位不同的读者在1个不同月份把它推荐出来,其中明确叫别人去看的有0次。适合用一集把一个概念补上的人。抓住它用的那个图像或类比,比背公式重要。如果已经会了基本定义,就把注意力放在它怎么把election statistics debunking变成能跟着复述的例子。
视频信息
- 频道
- Stand-up Maths
- 时长
- 19 分 55 秒
- 发布年份
- 2020
同主题更多
- A Better Default Colormap for Matplotlib | SciPy 2015 | Nathaniel Smith and Stéfan van der Walt
- DON'T PANIC — Hans Rosling showing the facts about population
- Is Most Published Research Wrong?
- How not to be ignorant about the world | Hans and Ola Rosling
- I don't like notebooks.- Joel Grus (Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence)
- VisiData Lightning Demo at PyCascades 2018